Re: CyChrome & PerCP

Tom Mc Closkey (thomasm@nshs.edu)
Fri, 6 Sep 96 16:30:48 PDT

On Wed, 4 Sep 1996 15:54:36 -0400 (EDT) Paul J. Jansen wrote:
>
>Well, we have used both CyChrome and PcP, and we like PcP. CyChrome was
>very bright and made compensation a nightmare, whereas PcP was dimmer,
>yet this resulted in much easier compensation. BD FACscan one laser is
>the machine we use.

I'm curious which marker combinations made compensation so difficult with
cychrome and in which direction was the problem? How different were the
compensation settings with perCP?

-------------------------------------
Name: Tom Mc Closkey
E-mail: thomasm@nshs.edu
Date: 09/06/96
Time: 16:30:48

This message was sent by Chameleon
-------------------------------------
Thomas W. Mc Closkey, Ph. D.
Director, Flow Cytometry
North Shore University Hospital
Cornell University Medical College
Manhasset, Long Island, New York
ph: 516-562-4641 fax: 516-562-2866
e-mail: thomasm@nshs.edu